A tale of two forces

The way I understand the article by Pischetola et al. (2022) is that networked learning isn’t created just because people are placed in the same class, online platform, or discussion board.  That is like saying a casino floor is running well just because the tables are open and employees are scheduled.  A casino floor only works when people, systems, communication, and real-time adjustments all connect.  According to Pischetola et al. (2022), The same is true with learning.

The article talks about two forces:  One force pulls people toward structure and rules - like a policy manual and standard service expectations in a casino.  Without these, there isn't order to operations.  The other force pushes people toward new ideas and different viewpoints for problem-solving.  In a casino, it’s using feedback from multiple perspectives to seek new and better outcomes.  

What stood out to me is that the authors are not saying one side is better.  The value is in the movement between the two.  That made sense to me from operations.  The best decisions usually came when leadership didn't just issue instructions from the top, but also listened to the people on the edges of the operation.  Even weak connections matter because a casual conversation with someone from another department could reveal something our own team was missing.

For me, the article simplifies to this: networked learning is not just about technology by itself. It is about designing spaces where people connect, share different perspectives, and create better understanding together.

References

Pischetola, M., Wichmand, M., Hall, R., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2022). Designing for the materialization of networked learning spaces. In J. Jaldemark, M. Håkansson Lindqvist, P. Mozelius, A. Öberg, M. de Laat, N. B. Dohn, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings for the Thirteenth International Conference on Networked Learning 2022 (pp. 1–10).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Just your everyday Lurker..

Dennen, V.P. (2026). From lurkers to networkers:  Cultural and epistemic dimensions of developing professional learning networks in online graduate education.  Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning, 15. https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v15.10887 To me, one of the most interesting ideas in this article was the concept that many people begin their professional learning network (PLN) journey as 'lurkers' before becoming active contributors.  As someone with more than 30 years of leadership experience in casino and hospitality operations, I found this concept completely relatable.  During my career, I often learned by observing experienced leaders, listening carefully, and studying successful practices before contributing my own ideas.  The article helped me realize that this behavior is a natural part of the learning process and not a weakness.   The article argues that developing a PLN is much more than simply joining online group...
Read more

The challenge of challenges

One of the recurring themes in my studies has been the tension between structured learning and self-directed learning. The article Optional Embedded Microlearning Challenges: Promoting Self-Directed Learning and Extension in a Higher Education Course (Dennen et al., 2024) explores that tension through a series of optional "tech-flex" challenges that were embedded within a university course. Students were given opportunities to complete short learning activities, earn digital badges, and develop skills beyond the required curriculum.  The researchers observed that although students viewed the challenges positively, participation rates remained low. What stood out to me was not the finding that participation was low, but rather why it was low. Students consistently cited time and competing priorities as barriers. As someone who spent decades leading teams in casino operations and now in my personal educational quest, I find that reality very familiar. Employees would often expr...
Read more