Change doesn't happen just because we announce it

The point that stood out to me in Pan and Chen’s article is that change is not just a matter of telling professionals what to do.  Teachers are often asked to adopt new methods, new curriculum models, and new expectations.  Anyone who has worked in leadership knows that announcing a change is the easy part.  Getting people to believe in the change is where the real work begins.

The article focuses on networked learning communities, where teachers work with other teachers across schools through lesson planning, classroom observation, and discussion.  The authors found that participation alone was not the strongest driver of change.  The key factor was whether teachers developed stronger beliefs in collaborative professional learning.  In other words, it wasn’t just the meetings, observations, or the discussions that mattered.  It was whether those experiences changed how teachers viewed the value of learning with one another.

I have seen plenty of initiatives rolled out from above – a new service standard, training process, or a new procedure may look good on paper, but if the frontline leaders do not believe in it, the change usually becomes surface-level compliance.  People attend the meeting, nod at the right time, and then go back to doing things the old way.  This amusingly reminds me of an old Mark Twain reference, “Even Huck Finn stayed saved until Tuesday.”

Real change happens when people see a better way work in real time.  A supervisor watching another supervisor handle a difficult guest situation well learns more than from a memo.  A trainer observing another trainer lead an effective session may begin to rethink his or her own approach.  The practical power of these learning communities is that they make professional learning visible, shared, and connected to actual work.

For me, the article reinforces that professional growth is not just about acquiring information.  It is also about changing assumptions.  People become more open to change when they can see the purpose, test the practice, and discuss it with peers they respect.  According to the article, belief is often the bridge between training and real implementation.

Reference

Pan, H.-L. W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2023). Networked Learning Communities in Promoting Teachers’ Receptivity to Change: How Professional Learning Beliefs and Behaviors Mediate. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032396


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Just your everyday Lurker..

Dennen, V.P. (2026). From lurkers to networkers:  Cultural and epistemic dimensions of developing professional learning networks in online graduate education.  Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning, 15. https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v15.10887 To me, one of the most interesting ideas in this article was the concept that many people begin their professional learning network (PLN) journey as 'lurkers' before becoming active contributors.  As someone with more than 30 years of leadership experience in casino and hospitality operations, I found this concept completely relatable.  During my career, I often learned by observing experienced leaders, listening carefully, and studying successful practices before contributing my own ideas.  The article helped me realize that this behavior is a natural part of the learning process and not a weakness.   The article argues that developing a PLN is much more than simply joining online group...
Read more

The challenge of challenges

One of the recurring themes in my studies has been the tension between structured learning and self-directed learning. The article Optional Embedded Microlearning Challenges: Promoting Self-Directed Learning and Extension in a Higher Education Course (Dennen et al., 2024) explores that tension through a series of optional "tech-flex" challenges that were embedded within a university course. Students were given opportunities to complete short learning activities, earn digital badges, and develop skills beyond the required curriculum.  The researchers observed that although students viewed the challenges positively, participation rates remained low. What stood out to me was not the finding that participation was low, but rather why it was low. Students consistently cited time and competing priorities as barriers. As someone who spent decades leading teams in casino operations and now in my personal educational quest, I find that reality very familiar. Employees would often expr...
Read more